Three Proven Ways To Improve Productivity


“I’ve got to find a way to improve my team’s performance,” a frustrated manager said to me. “Competition has increased in my territory and we are losing ground.”

“What have you tried?” I asked.

“I’ve made my team aware of our declining performance metrics. I’ve asked them to work a little harder and be more diligent in serving our clients. I’ve also explained that we will lose positions if the decline continues. I’ve asked for suggestions, but we haven’t been able to move the needle in the right direction.”

I recommended three things the manager can do to improve performance: better people, better tools and better methods.

By far, the most impactful, and the most difficult, path to improved performance is to infuse the team with more talented and resolute players.

Improved tools (think technological advancements—robots, software applications, smart devices) have accounted for much of the productivity improvement over the last five decades.

A third path to better performance is to invent better ways of doing what you are doing—eliminate or refine required processes, allow performers more freedom in how they do their jobs, require fewer approvals for decisions.  Many bureaucratic requirements are costly but add little value. 

Quality or Schedule–Which Has Priority?


After relationships went south with a major account, the general manager
lamented, “My sales manager and production manager are acting like immature
third graders arguing over who hit the glass window with the ball.”

In a meeting to resolve the issue, the sales manager faulted the production manager, “Get your people to do their jobs so I can get products to our clients on schedule.”

“Why don’t you quit promising delivery times that you know we can’t meet?” countered the production manager. 

Mission statements and posters touting quality adorn the walls of offices and plants.  However, on-time delivery frequently trumps quality. Customers agree to purchases based on ability to meet deadlines and frequently demand discounts when delivery is late. Many a manager has felt the wrath of their leader when they missed a scheduled date. Rejected or returned product gives rise to the expression, “We did not have time to do it right the first time, but we always find the time to do it over.”

Of course, all wish to produce high quality and meet all delivery dates, but sometimes it is not possible to get both. Which is it–quality or schedule?  Contributors and managers need to be on the same page.